To read this content please select one of the options below:

Reporting on the state of infrastructure by local government

R.G. Walker ( School of Accounting, University of New South Wales, Australia)
F.L. Clarke ( University of Newcastle, Central Coast Campus, Australia)
G.W. Dean (Department of Accounting, University of Sydney, Australia)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 1 October 1999

2009

Abstract

The Australian accounting profession has advocated that infrastructure should be accounted for by reporting it at current written down replacement values, on the basis that these financial disclosures would provide relevant information to stakeholders. While local councils are required to apply the profession’s asset valuation and accrual standards in preparing general purpose financial reports, the State of New South Wales has gone further by requiring local councils to also present information about the physical condition of infrastructure, together with estimates of the cost of bringing that infrastructure to a satisfactory condition, and the annual costs of maintaining infrastructure at that standard thereafter. This paper examines how this information was reported for 1995‐96. Analysis of reporting practices suggest that while there are some anomalies and uncertainties surrounding the rating of physical condition and the concept of “satisfactory condition”, the disclosures provided by NSW local government are more informative and arguably more relevant to external stakeholders and those responsible for asset management in local government than the information currently prescribed by accounting standards.

Keywords

Citation

Walker, R.G., Clarke, F.L. and Dean, G.W. (1999), "Reporting on the state of infrastructure by local government", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910283477

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles