To read this content please select one of the options below:

Questioning the value of the research selectivity process in British university accounting

Christopher Humphrey (University of Leeds, School of Business and Economic Studies, UK.)
Peter Moizer (University of Leeds, School of Business and Economic Studies, UK.)
David Owen (University of Management School, Sheffield, UK.)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 1 August 1995

981

Abstract

Provides a response to Puxty et al.′s call for academics to become involved in public policy debate. Addresses the issue of the effect on British university accounting research of the promotion and undertaking of continual research selectivity exercises. This should be of direct concern to accounting and other academics. The key message is that greater co‐operation, not competition, is needed both to secure a healthy future for academic accounting across the broad range of institutions in which the subject is researched and taught, and to provide a worthwhile educational experience for all students, not just the favoured few.

Keywords

Citation

Humphrey, C., Moizer, P. and Owen, D. (1995), "Questioning the value of the research selectivity process in British university accounting", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510094732

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles