Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
ISSN: 0951-3574
Article publication date: 28 March 2008
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this paper is to respond to commentaries on Bebbington, Larrinaga‐Gonzales and Moneva, by Unerman and by Adams, published in Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper reviews and discusses the points suggested/contested by the commentary papers.
Findings
That given the current state of our understanding of corporate social responsibility reporting in stand alone (and other) formats, openness to a multitude of theoretical perspectives is appropriate. Further, that concepts of legitimacy and reputation can and should be distinguished from one another.
Originality/value
The authors put forward their views, beliefs and reservations.
Keywords
Citation
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga‐González, C. and Moneva‐Abadía, J.M. (2008), "Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 371-374. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863969
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited