To read this content please select one of the options below:

The formation of public‐public partnerships: A case study examination of collaboration on a “back to work” initiative

Kay Greasley (University of Warwick, Coventry, UK)
Paul J. Watson (University of Leicester, Leicester, UK)
Shilpa Patel (University of Leicester, Leicester, UK)

International Journal of Public Sector Management

ISSN: 0951-3558

Article publication date: 4 April 2008




This article aims to explore public‐public partnership issues arising when public sector organisations work together in order to deliver a new government sponsored initiative.


A qualitative approach was adopted for this study, employing in‐depth interviews across four UK case study sites. The rich qualitative data gathered from these interviews is analysed utilising a thematic framework.


The findings indicate that most of the participants did not feel that they were involved in a partnership and had little or no contact with their partner. The key role of inter‐personal relationships amongst individual members is emphasised.

Research limitations/implications

The findings presented represent the pilot sites utilised in a government sponsored initiative. As future public‐public partnerships develop, further research should be undertaken to explore this phenomenon and establish the generalisability of these findings.

Practical implications

The study indicates that while there are clear benefits of partnership working, achieving successful collaboration is not straightforward. Improvements need to be made to develop partnerships using both formal and informal communication methods.


This paper demonstrates the importance of the relationships between, and perceptions of, personnel at an individual level in the success of public‐public partnerships.



Greasley, K., Watson, P.J. and Patel, S. (2008), "The formation of public‐public partnerships: A case study examination of collaboration on a “back to work” initiative", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 305-313.



Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles