To read this content please select one of the options below:

Measuring fire service performance: a comparative study

J. Carvalho (School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal)
M. Fernandes (School of Management, Instituto Politecnico do Cavado e Ave, Barcelos, Portugal)
V. Lambert (IPSAR, Management School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK)
I. Lapsley (IPSAR, Management School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK)

International Journal of Public Sector Management

ISSN: 0951-3558

Article publication date: 1 February 2006

3067

Abstract

Purpose

The new public management (NPM) agenda is transforming the public sector in many countries. However, there have been criticisms of NPM, particularly over its emphasis on quantification, results orientation and the measurement of performance to the possible detriment of service delivery. The purpose of this paper is to examine an important public service – the fire service – in differing contexts: the “mature” NPM setting of the UK, and a “late adopter” of NPM – Portugal.

Design/methodology/approach

This study is conducted by a combined methods approach. The principal focus of this study is on publicly available databases of performance indicators. The data are supported by additional material from operational officers in fire services, and from oversight bodies, obtained by interviews and by survey in Portugal.

Findings

This comparative study reaffirms the potential for NPM solutions to public service management. In particular, there is a case for carefully targeted key performance indicators in Portuguese fire services.

Originality/value

This paper makes an original contribution to ideas of NPM in action by focussing on performance measurement in different contexts. The comparative aspect of this paper is crucial as a means of assessing the portability of NPM ideas in different national settings.

Keywords

Citation

Carvalho, J., Fernandes, M., Lambert, V. and Lapsley, I. (2006), "Measuring fire service performance: a comparative study", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610650428

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles