“Great classroom teaching” and more: Awards for outstanding teaching evaluated

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper teaching excellence awards are evaluated, with an eye to improving them.

Design/methodology/approach

Literature is reviewed and an analytic framework developed in Canada is modified to apply to the University of Sydney's Vice Chancellor Outstanding Teaching Award. Data come from 60 respondents familiar with the Sydney award and web research on the Australian Group of Eight research‐intensive universities.

Findings

Among the conclusions reached are that the Sydney award is supported even by those who have been unsuccessful in applying for it, that awards alone do not make teaching the equal to research in a university that identifies itself as a research university, awards that integrate into the university's strategic direction are powerful, and that awards that have a continuing profile ease that integration.

Research limitations/implications

Along the way, several contentious points are discussed including the relationship of awards to promotion and the importance of pedagogic awareness of the reflective practitioner in picking out outstanding teachers who can articulate their approach to benefit others and to integrate with the larger purposes of the university beyond their own classroom.

Originality/value

Some practical means to enhance the impact of teaching awards are identified.

Citation

Jackson, M. (2006), "“Great classroom teaching” and more: Awards for outstanding teaching evaluated", International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610665388