TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose– Previous research shows that question order affects responses, but does not indicate which order is more accurate. This study aims to examine the effect of three question orders on measurements of SERVQUAL and global quality in an effort to determine which order produced the most predictive measures.Design/methodology/approach– Three forms of a survey were randomly distributed to users of different services; banking, dental services, and hair salons. Correlation with intention of future interaction was used to identify the order that resulted in the most predictive quality measure.Findings– The paper finds that correlations with intention of future interaction were highest for SERVQUAL in the global‐SERVQUAL order, but highest for the global quality measure in the random order.Research limitation/implications– This study indicates that practitioners and academicians should order questionnaire items differently depending on how the results will be used and which type of measure, specific or global service quality, is the focus of a questionnaire. Generalizations are limited to SERVQUAL and multiple item measures of service quality.Practical implications– The findings indicate which of several question orders can be used to generate the most predictive measures of SERVQUAL and global service quality.Originality/value– Previous research has examined measurement effects of specific‐general question orders, without indicating which order is most predictive. This study includes a random order and also suggests appropriate item order for predictive measures.
VL  - 22
IS  - 3
SN  - 0887-6045
DO  - 10.1108/08876040810871200
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040810871200
AU  - DeMoranville Carol W.
AU  - Bienstock Carol C.
AU  - Judson Kim
PY  - 2008
Y1  - 2008/01/01
TI  - Using question order for predictive service quality measures
T2  - Journal of Services Marketing
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 255
EP  - 262
Y2  - 2024/09/23
ER  -