To read this content please select one of the options below:

Cooperate “and” compete: coopetition strategy in retailer‐supplier relationships

Stephen Kim (Department of Marketing, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)
Namwoon Kim (Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China)
Jae H. Pae (Ewha School of Business, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea)
Leslie Yip (Hong Kong Polytechnic University – SPEED, Hong Kong, PR China)

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN: 0885-8624

Article publication date: 5 April 2013

3942

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the strategic implications and managerial outcomes of the concurrent use of cooperation and competition in vertical channel relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employs a structured questionnaire to gather data regarding vertical channel relationships in China.

Findings

Whereas the academic literature has emphasized cooperation between channel members because of the interdependence between them, in reality, retailers may accept competition as just another part of doing business with suppliers.

Research limitations/implications

The outcome variables used may not be comprehensive. In particular, the authors choose the flexibility of channel resources to stand for private benefits and joint benefits to represent common benefits, and though these variables certainly represent the intended benefits of the ambidextrous strategy, it remains to be seen whether other benefits may emerge for the exchange parties in vertical relationships.

Practical implications

Using an ambidextrous strategy does not damage relationship quality, though it certainly does not enhance it. This view is based on the notion that an ambidextrous strategy at least does not harm either common or private benefits. Therefore, exchange parties using the ambidextrous strategy should not experience a relationship that is worse than that which results when they use cooperation or competition alone. The results of the current study indicate that this view reflects reality more accurately.

Originality/value

The value of the current study centers on the application of a conceptual framework regarding ambidextrous strategy to vertical channel relationships in a developing economy.

Keywords

Citation

Kim, S., Kim, N., Pae, J.H. and Yip, L. (2013), "Cooperate “and” compete: coopetition strategy in retailer‐supplier relationships", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621311313875

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles