Capturing and (re)interpreting complexity in multi‐firm disruptive product innovations

Hugh M. Pattinson (University of Technology, Sydney, Australia)
Arch G. Woodside (Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA)

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN: 0885-8624

Publication date: 1 January 2009

Abstract

Purpose

This case study research report aims to include collecting additional field interviews with the original and additional executives participating in the original case study (on the Zaplet software applications firm) to enhance the interpretations by the original case study investigators as well as add‐in downstream events occurring after the original report. The focus of the study is to increase descriptive knowledge and understanding of innovation and diffusion processes in developing high‐tech disruptive software technologies.

Design/methodology/approach

The study includes an application of the long‐interview method and reinterpretation of original case data along with preparing and interpreting decision system analysis and chronological maps.

Findings

The reinterpretation and expansion of the original case study illustrate dramatic revisions in plans and implementing new applications following positive and negative responses by third‐parties and lead‐user customers to alpha and beta designs. Concrete field trials occur frequently in shaping where and how the firm goes about changing its direction. Third‐parties play critical roles in multiple time periods in shaping the firm's new product development direction.

Research limitations/implications

The case study reanalysis and expansion are generalizable to innovation and diffusion theory and not to a specific population of firms.

Practical implications

The paper illustrates the wisdom of Tom Peter's dictum, “Put it to tin quickly” and Dwight Eisenhower's focus on improvising, “The plan is nothing, planning is everything.”

Originality/value

Formal sensemaking of what happened helps to destroy the myth that executives must have the resources before innovating. Resources follow vision and action (implementing) is the hidden and great lesson of this paper – what Tom Peters means when he writes about the value in creating a “skunk works” – using “borrowed” time, material, places, and creative juices to make things happen.

Keywords

Citation

Pattinson, H.M. and Woodside, A.G. (2009), "Capturing and (re)interpreting complexity in multi‐firm disruptive product innovations", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620910923711

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.