To read this content please select one of the options below:

The efficacy of power and influence strategies in a conventional channel: a Singapore perspective

Prem Shamdasani (Associate Professor of Marketing, Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Hean Tat Keh (Assistant Professor of Marketing, Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Kenny Ter‐Sin Chan (Former Undergraduate Honors Research Student, Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration, National Univeristy of Singapore, Singapore)

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN: 0885-8624

Article publication date: 1 February 2001

1418

Abstract

In contrast to many studies that were conducted in a Western context, this study seeks to extend the understanding and empirical findings on power, dependence, and interfirm influence strategies by examining these issues within a channel of distribution in Singapore. Research hypotheses are developed, centering on the relationship between a manufacturer’s power and its use of coercive and noncoercive influence strategies as well as the reciprocal use of coercive and noncoercive influence strategies in the channel dyad. Data from a field study of personal computer dealers are used in testing the research hypotheses. In contrast to most previous studies, a multiple‐item measure of influence strategies is used. Among the findings is that a manufacturer in this channel setting tends to use both coercive and noncoercive influence strategies in influencing its dealers.

Keywords

Citation

Shamdasani, P., Tat Keh, H. and Ter‐Sin Chan, K. (2001), "The efficacy of power and influence strategies in a conventional channel: a Singapore perspective", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620110364864

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles