Persuasive territories in European cultural politics: critical and controlled knowledgescapes

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to view the concept of persuasive technology as a framework for discussing cultural politics on the internet. Taking digital collections as a point of departure, the cases of Europeana and Google Books are to be discussed as promoting different assemblies of information, practice and identity politics. Through this discussion the study aims to show how the internet becomes territorialized through persuasive mechanisms.

Design/methodology/approach

The study applies different concepts on the cases, derived from different fields of social theory, such as “soft power”, “assembly” and “folksonomy” in order to question the traditional view of persuasive technology as a concept instrumental to, for example, marketing agendas. Targeting the relation between policy and everyday practice, the paper aims to open a discussion of persuasive technology deeply embedded in digital cultural politics.

Findings

The study points through a conceptual investigation to a new scene for critically debating persuasive technology as digital cultural politics. The cases in question emphasize the relation between microscopic practices and global agendas on the internet, and the study concludes that the concepts employed can qualify such a future debate.

Research limitations/implications

The paper suggests a number of problems and questions, but since the cases have limited source material, the perspective is rather to suggest a change of terminology than analyzing Europeana or Google Books. What is found, though, is that a future critical debate of persuasive territories is more important than ever before.

Originality/value

This paper points to a new potential in the use of persuasion as a concept in the study of cultural power relations.

Citation

Thelle, M. and Bonde Thylstrup, N. (2011), "Persuasive territories in European cultural politics: critical and controlled knowledgescapes", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111189705