TY - JOUR AB - Purpose– The aim of this paper is to gauge how academic libraries treat publishing a blog.Design/methodology/approach– As blogging becomes more popular, the question arises as to whether it should count as scholarship or a creative activity in academic promotion and tenure. To find out, the author sent a link to a questionnaire to several e‐mail lists, inviting academic librarians to answer a short survey.Findings– In total, 73.9 percent of respondents indicated that their institution expects them to engage in scholarly activities and/or publish scholarly articles, 53.6 percent indicated that their performance review committees do not weigh a blog the same as an article published in a peer‐reviewed journal.Research limitations/implications– As technology changes, policies will need to change.Practical implications– Libraries may need to adapt to new forms of scholarship. Electronic scholarship needs a mechanism for peer‐review.Originality/value– The paper is original – the author did not find any other surveys regarding blogging as scholarship in the library literature. VL - 28 IS - 3 SN - 0737-8831 DO - 10.1108/07378831011076701 UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011076701 AU - Hendricks Arthur PY - 2010 Y1 - 2010/01/01 TI - Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians T2 - Library Hi Tech PB - Emerald Group Publishing Limited SP - 470 EP - 477 Y2 - 2024/09/18 ER -