A response to Koku’s comments on Alpert, Wilson and Elliott’s article on price signaling

Frank Alpert (Associate Professor in the Department of Marketing at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia)

Journal of Consumer Marketing

ISSN: 0736-3761

Publication date: 1 December 1996

Abstract

In a comment in a 1995 issue of the Journal of Consumer Marketing, Paul Koku criticizes an article in a 1993 issue of the Journal of Consumer Marketing, “Price signaling: does it ever work?”, by Alpert, Wilson and Elliott. In this response to Koku’s comment, it is argued that, although Koku views price signaling strictly as a borrowed concept, marketing is a mature discipline and is entitled to develop its own uses of such concepts. Furthermore, it is argued that the specifics of the case that was studied support the argument that price signaling (as defined in the 1993 article to mean using prices as a signal of quality when objective quality is not demonstrably superior) is only effective when combined with “premium quality positioning” throughout the marketing mix. Contrary to Koku’s argument, such premium quality positioning does succeed for the case that was studied, and prices above that which objective quality would support are sustained.

Keywords

Citation

Alpert, F. (1996), "A response to Koku’s comments on Alpert, Wilson and Elliott’s article on price signaling", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 59-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769610152608

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.