To read this content please select one of the options below:

Relationship between intangibility and perceived risk: moderating effect of privacy, system security and general security concerns

Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno (Department of Marketing, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada)
Michel Laroche (Department of Marketing, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada)
Marie‐Odile Richard (Department of Marketing, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada)
Axel Eggert (Department of Business, Anhalt University, Bernburg, Germany)

Journal of Consumer Marketing

ISSN: 0736-3761

Article publication date: 27 April 2012

3746

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore the association between intangibility and perceived risk using a sample of North American households. This relationship is explored within two purchase environments, namely online and offline. The authors also investigated the moderating effects of privacy, system security and general security concerns when purchasing in an online environment.

Design/methodology/approach

The survey was delivered to 156 households in a small town in the Midwest and collected upon completion.

Findings

The perception of risk is increased when two negatively loaded pieces of information are processed simultaneously (i.e. product intangibility and privacy concern). Furthermore, system security was identified as the most relevant concern in e‐commerce.

Research limitations/implications

The representativeness of the sample is limited. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

Originality/value

The results provide interesting insights about the generalizability of previous findings based on student samples, and show the importance of privacy concerns, system security concerns, general security concerns for those purchasing in online environments.

Keywords

Citation

Vinhal Nepomuceno, M., Laroche, M., Richard, M. and Eggert, A. (2012), "Relationship between intangibility and perceived risk: moderating effect of privacy, system security and general security concerns", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211221701

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles