Second‐order cybernetics and enactive perception

Abstract

Purpose

To present an account of cognition integrating second‐order cybernetics (SOC) together with enactive perception and dynamic systems theory.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper presents a brief critique of classical models of cognition then outlines how integration of SOC, enactive perception and dynamic systems theory can overcome some weaknesses of the classical paradigm.

Findings

Presents the critique of evolutionary robotics showing how the issues of teleology and autonomy are left unresolved by this paradigm although their solution fits within the proposed framework.

Research limitations/implications

The paper highlights the importance of genuine autonomy in the development of artificial cognitive systems. It sets out a framework within which the robotic research of cognitive systems could succeed.

Practical implications

There are no immediate practical implications but see research implications.

Originality/value

It joins the discussion on the fundamental nature of cognitive systems and emphasise the importance of autonomy and embodiment.

Citation

Bishop, J.M. and Nasuto, J.S. (2005), "Second‐order cybernetics and enactive perception", Kybernetes, Vol. 34 No. 9/10, pp. 1309-1320. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920510614696