What should training evaluations evaluate?

Sandi Mann (BNFL Corporate Communications Unit, The Management School, University of Salford, Salford, UK, and)

Journal of European Industrial Training

ISSN: 0309-0590

Publication date: 1 December 1996


Training initiatives are widely acknowledged to be a salient feature of the competitive organization’s corporate strategy. Contends that, despite the heavy investment in training, organizations frequently fail to evaluate adequately the value or success of their training programmes. Those companies which do evaluate often use measures considered ineffective by many researchers. Part of the reason for companies’ reluctance to evaluate their training may be confusion as to how and what to evaluate. Reviews some of the barriers to effective training evaluation and outlines the benefits that organizations which do evaluate can invite. Describes the results and implications for organizations of a study undertaken in Europe to answer the question: “What should training evaluations evaluate?” Concludes that neither reactions to training nor immediate post‐training knowledge are predictors of subsequent self‐efficacy (an established indicator of actual performance).



Mann, S. (1996), "What should training evaluations evaluate?", Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 20 No. 9, pp. 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599610150264

Download as .RIS




Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.