To read this content please select one of the options below:

Franchise relationship quality: micro‐economic explanations

Gillian C. Hopkinson (Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)
Sandra Hogarth‐Scott (University of Bradford Management Centre, Bradford, UK)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Article publication date: 1 October 1999

3136

Abstract

Examines the behavioural implications of the three main micro‐economic explanations – resource constraint, agency theory and search cost theory – for franchising. Reviews these theories, along with the empirical evidence found to support them. Highlights the implications of each explanation upon relational quality using four relational characteristics drawn from Macneil. Uses the characteristics of power balance, anticipation of trouble, sense of unity and presentation of costs and benefits. Argues that since the motivation to franchise depends upon the specific strategy employed by the franchisor, then relational quality will legitimately differ according to franchisor strategy. Describes a model drawn by linking strategic direction, franchise motivation and relational quality. Some illustrative propositions are derived from the model. Discusses the implications of the theory for both researchers and managers.

Keywords

Citation

Hopkinson, G.C. and Hogarth‐Scott, S. (1999), "Franchise relationship quality: micro‐economic explanations", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33 No. 9/10, pp. 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910285751

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles