To read this content please select one of the options below:

Executive compensation and the horizon problem: a synthesis of the economics of age and decision management

John D. McGinnis (The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona College)
James A. Miles (The Pennsylvania State University, Smeal College of Business)
Shin‐Herng Michelle Chu (California State Polytechnic University at Pomona)
Terry L. Campbell (University of Delaware, College of Business & Economics)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 1 October 1999

909

Abstract

Relates previous research on the importance of age in decision‐making to Fama and Jensen’s (1983) ideas on decision management, develops hypotheses on the age of managers and the use of stock‐based compensation in companies with long time horizons (i.e. growth companies) and tests them on 1979‐1987 data for a sample of US firms. Explains the methodology used and presents the results, which show that these firms tend to have younger subordinate executives (but not younger CEOs) and to use less stock‐based compensation the younger these executives are. Suggests this is because younger executives effectively extend the time horizon of older CEOs, thus reducing the need to do this through the compensation package.

Keywords

Citation

McGinnis, J.D., Miles, J.A., Michelle Chu, S. and Campbell, T.L. (1999), "Executive compensation and the horizon problem: a synthesis of the economics of age and decision management", Managerial Finance, Vol. 25 No. 10, pp. 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074359910766217

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles