To read this content please select one of the options below:

Thinking preferences as diagnostic and learning tools for managerial styles and predictors of auditor success

Penny Clayton (Breech School of Business Administration, Drury College, Springfield, Missouri, USA)
Janet Kimbrell (School of Accounting, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 23 October 2007

1643

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the thought processes of financial auditors in order to offer additional information on factors affecting their decision behavior.

Design/methodology/approach

Using the psychology concept of cerebral dominance, two different instruments are used to measure the thinking styles of 20 auditors, at different stages of management. Prior research has indicated that “whole‐brain” thinkers (who do not exhibit dominance in either left‐ or right‐brain) may make better decisions, and thus, better managers.

Findings

The results of this study show partners in public accounting firms usually exhibiting a whole‐brain thinking style, while lower levels of management (staff auditors and managers) usually exhibit left‐brain thinking styles.

Originality/value

The findings have implications for training, education, communication, managerial styles, as well as the individual's position within the firm.

Keywords

Citation

Clayton, P. and Kimbrell, J. (2007), "Thinking preferences as diagnostic and learning tools for managerial styles and predictors of auditor success", Managerial Finance, Vol. 33 No. 12, pp. 921-934. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710831701

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles