TY  - JOUR
AB  - Dualism ‐ the division of an object of study into separate, paired elements ‐ is widespread in economic and social theorising: key examples are the divisions between agency and structure, the individual and society, mind and body, values and facts, and knowledge and practice. In recent years, dualism has been criticised as exaggerating conceptual divisions and promoting an oversimplified, reductive outlook. A possible alternative to dualism is the notion of duality, derived from Giddens’s structuration theory, whereby the two elements are interdependent and no longer separate or opposed, although they remain conceptually distinct. This paper argues that duality, if handled carefully, can provide a superior framework to dualism for dealing with the complexity of economic and social institutions. Its main attraction is not its twofold character, which might profitably be relaxed where appropriate, but its ability to envisage a thoroughgoing interdependence of conceptually distinct elements.
VL  - 26
IS  - 4
SN  - 0306-8293
DO  - 10.1108/03068299910215997
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910215997
AU  - Jackson William A.
PY  - 1999
Y1  - 1999/01/01
TI  - Dualism, duality and the complexity of economic institutions
T2  - International Journal of Social Economics
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 545
EP  - 558
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -