To read this content please select one of the options below:

Veblen and globalization: a comment on Wellington and Zandvakili

Ken McCormick (Department of Economics, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, USA)

International Journal of Social Economics

ISSN: 0306-8293

Article publication date: 1 July 2006

559

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to examine the claim made by Wellington and Zandvakili that Thorstein Veblen would be opposed to globalization.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach of the paper is to examine what Veblen actually said in order to provide evidence from Veblen's own pen.

Findings

Veblen forcefully argued that trade barriers are another form of business sabotage. Trade barriers increase business profits but harm the community as a whole. That is because trade barriers inhibit specialization, and specialization is required for technological progress. Trade barriers therefore impede progress from the standpoint of humanity as a whole.

Practical implications

National boundaries impede technological development because they reduce specialization. Trade barriers make the problem worse, and therefore are harmful. Trade barriers help business at the expense of the general public.

Originality/value

The paper offers an argument for reducing trade barriers that is not derived from neoclassical economics. It should be of interest to anyone interested in the debate about globalization as well as those interested in Thorstein Veblen.

Keywords

Citation

McCormick, K. (2006), "Veblen and globalization: a comment on Wellington and Zandvakili", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 33 No. 7, pp. 529-532. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610673289

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles