To read this content please select one of the options below:

Auditing income tax self‐assessment: the hidden cost of compliance

John L. Turner (Post‐graduate student, School of Accounting, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia)
Malcolm Smith (Professor, School of Accounting, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia)
Bruce Gurd (Lecturer, School of Accounting, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 1 March 1998

3834

Abstract

Virtually all of the completed research to date shows that taxpayer compliance costs are large and generally a multiple of the revenue authority’s administrative costs. Compliance costs have also been found to be capricious in their incidence and generally highly regressive. On the other hand, for some taxes (eg. Employer PAYE deductions), much of the research shows that larger firms derive a net economic benefit from enhanced cash flows. There is also perceived to be a fair correlation between high compliance costs and high non‐compliance. These findings and perceptions have led to government pressure in most developed countries to reduce compliance costs. This paper explores the likely impact of compliance costs in the UK as income tax self‐assessment is introduced, leaning on evidence from Australia, where self‐assessment is the standard.

Keywords

Citation

Turner, J.L., Smith, M. and Gurd, B. (1998), "Auditing income tax self‐assessment: the hidden cost of compliance", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909810202782

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles