To read this content please select one of the options below:

Audit committee characteristics and loss reserve error

Fang Sun (Department of Economics, CUNY, New York, New York, USA)
Xiangjing Wei (Department of Business and Economics, Wilson College, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, USA)
Yang Xu (School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 13 April 2012

1641

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate two audit committee characteristics – independence and expertise of the audit committee – and the property‐liability insurers' financial reporting quality, which is proxied by loss reserve error.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors' hypotheses are tested using multivariate analysis where the loss reserve error is the dependent variable, and audit committee independence, and four types of audit committee financial expertise (accounting, finance, supervisory, and insurance expertise) are the testing variables.

Findings

It is found that accounting, finance, and insurance financial expertise are associated with more accurate loss reserve estimate. In contrast, a supervisory financial expertise and an independence audit committee are not found to be associated with better loss reserve quality.

Research limitations/implications

The sample includes publicly‐held property‐liability insurers. Although the results from publicly‐held insurers could provide a good laboratory for such investigation in all insurers, they might be limited due to different organization structures of public vs private insurers.

Practical implications

The implications of the study are important for the SEC and NAIC. The results suggest that the requirements on the audit committee financial expertise would be necessary, even in highly regulated industry, such as property‐casualty insurance.

Originality/value

The paper contributes to the extant literature by studying audit committee characteristics in the insurance industry. It also contributes to the extant literature on audit committee effectiveness by decomposing the financial expertise into four types of financial expertise (accounting, finance, supervisory, or insurance expertise) and investigates which (if any) of these four types of expertise really drives the improvement of loss reserve quality.

Keywords

Citation

Sun, F., Wei, X. and Xu, Y. (2012), "Audit committee characteristics and loss reserve error", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901211217978

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles