To read this content please select one of the options below:

Usage of Internal Auditing Standards and internal auditing activities in South Africa and all respondents

Marinda Marais (University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)
Priscilla A. Burnaby (Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA)
Susan Hass (Simmons College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA)
,
Elmarie Sadler (University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)
Houdini Fourie (University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 9 October 2009

3126

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to compare the responses of South African respondents with all Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK) 2006 respondents in the areas of compliance with the Institute of Internal Auditors' (IIA) International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) and several areas of the internal audit activity's (IAA) operations.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper summarises and discusses the survey results from questionnaires sent to the IIA members as of September 2006. For selected topics, the CBOK 2006 database is compared for South African respondents and non‐South African respondents.

Findings

The paper finds that South Africans have a higher level of compliance with the Standards than those respondents residing in other parts of the world. Since the internal auditing profession is so young in South Africa, compliance with the Standards gives structure and support to the new IAAs and internal auditors.

Originality/value

This is the first study comparing the status of the South African internal auditing profession with the global state of internal auditing, activities performed by internal auditors and the perception of the IAAs in their organizations.

Keywords

Citation

Marais, M., Burnaby, P.A., Hass, S., Sadler, E. and Fourie, H. (2009), "Usage of Internal Auditing Standards and internal auditing activities in South Africa and all respondents", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900910994818

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles