TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose– Despite existing life cycle costing (LCC) method descriptions and practicable suggestions for conducting LCC analyses, no systematic analyses on actual implementations of LCC methods exist. This paper aims to review reports on LCC applications to provide an overview of LCC uses and implementation feasibility.Design/methodology/approach– A review of LCC cases reported in academic and practitioner literature. Case reports were compared against one another and against the defining articles in the field.Findings– Most of the reported LCC applications were far from ideal. Compared to the methods suggested in the literature many of the case study applications: covered fewer parts of the whole life cycle, estimated the costs on a lower level of detail, used cost estimation methods based on expert opinion rather than statistical methods, and were content with deterministic estimates of life cycle costs instead of using sensitivity analyses.Research limitations/implications– This review is limited to reported LCC applications only. Further research is encouraged in the form of a field‐based multiple‐case study to reveal context‐specific dimensions of LCC analysis and implementation challenges in more detail.Practical implications– This review highlights the difficulty of conducting a reliable LCC analysis, and points out typical problems that should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the LCC analysis.Originality/value– First systematic analysis of LCC applications that gives directions for further research on the LCC concept.
VL  - 23
IS  - 3
SN  - 0268-6902
DO  - 10.1108/02686900810857703
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810857703
AU  - Korpi Eric
AU  - Ala‐Risku Timo
PY  - 2008
Y1  - 2008/01/01
TI  - Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies
T2  - Managerial Auditing Journal
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 240
EP  - 261
Y2  - 2024/05/11
ER  -