To read this content please select one of the options below:

Performance evaluation measures in the private sector: Egyptian practice

Tariq H. Ismail (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Commerce, University of Cairo, Cairo, Egypt)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 29 May 2007

4068

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine performance evaluation measures across private sector companies in an Egyptian context and pinpoints obstacles that may limit the adoption of the balanced scorecard (BSC).

Design/methodology/approach

Uses a questionnaire that was mailed to a sample of 150 companies listed in the Egyptian stock exchange market. The analysis is directed at determining managers' perceptions of performance evaluation measures within the Egyptian private sector. Descriptive statistics, frequency of use of companies' practices and possible relationships between variables provide the basis for discussion.

Findings

Companies rely on both financial and non‐financial measures of performance evaluation. The profit margin, as a financial measure, is also the most commonly used performance measure. Customer satisfaction is the most commonly used non‐financial measure of performance evaluation. The BSC has wide spread use in the Egyptian companies surveyed, but the level of use of multi‐dimensional indicators is significantly low. The survey provides considerable insight into obstacles inhibiting the adoption of the BSC. The most significant obstacle is the inadequacy of implemented information systems.

Research limitations/implication

Survey results restrict generalization, as the sampling design cannot be claimed to represent all Egyptian companies. Also a relatively low response rates must be taken into account.

Originality/value

Provides an insight into performance evaluation practices in the private sector in a developing country.

Keywords

Citation

Ismail, T.H. (2007), "Performance evaluation measures in the private sector: Egyptian practice", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710750775

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles