The foreign direct investment decision‐making process

Nicos Sykianakis (Piraeus Technological Education Institute, Athens, Greece)
Athanassios Bellas (University of Patras, Patras, Greece)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Publication date: 1 December 2005

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the foreign direct investment (FDI) decision‐making process, and to explore the roles of management accounting information to that.

Design/methodology/approach

An interpretive methodology was preferred, applying the case study method in a Greek company that had engaged in FDIs in the Balkans. In studying FDI decision‐making, the role of context (external environment and organisation) was taken into consideration.

Findings

The study reported here reveals that the FDI decision‐making process is cyclical in nature, with information continuously received, processed and used as feedback for subsequent action. This supports the view that the dichotomy between strategy formulation and implementation is a false one.

Practical implications

Although the FDI process should be recognised as iterative in nature, evidence from this study suggests that it can be thought of as comprising two main tasks, each of which makes different uses of management accounting information and reflects different decision‐making concerns. The first task concerns the decision whether or not to invest abroad while, the second task concerns decisions about how the project will be developed.

Originality/value

The implementation of capital investments enables the participation of various organizational actors trying to influence the final outcome of the process in line with their own interests. The recognition of differential political engagement within these two distinct decision‐making phases has implications for understanding capital investment practice and for reflecting on prior empirical evidence in this domain.

Keywords

Citation

Sykianakis, N. and Bellas, A. (2005), "The foreign direct investment decision‐making process", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 No. 9, pp. 954-969. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510625307

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.