TY  - JOUR
AB  - This paper surveys the evidence that environmental auditing systems (EMSs), and the standard setting bodies represented by ISO 14001 and EMAS, have failed to meet their objectives on two counts. First, the standards will not lead to sustainability and second, they will not be any more economically efficient than the command and control approach. We begin by offering an historical overview of environmental standards and argue that the original intentions to link the environmental management standards with sustainability was abandoned during discussions. The opposing viewpoints about ISO 14001 and EMAS as market driven standards are discussed and then the degree of market penetration of the standards is examined. The costs of implementing an EMS are discussed in the context of the Swiss experience, and the costs to SMEs of EMSs outlined. Practical difficulties associated with the standards are considered, and the question asked, “Do EMSs lead to environmental improvement?”
VL  - 19
IS  - 7
SN  - 0268-6902
DO  - 10.1108/02686900410549439
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900410549439
AU  - Watson Michael
AU  - Emery Anthony R.T.
PY  - 2004
Y1  - 2004/01/01
TI  - Environmental management and auditing systems: The reality of environmental self‐regulation
T2  - Managerial Auditing Journal
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 916
EP  - 928
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -