To read this content please select one of the options below:

Multi‐rater feedback methods: personal and organizational implications

Paul Jansen (Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and)
Daniël Vloeberghs (University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 1 November 1999

2715

Abstract

The conditions and implications for the use of multi‐rater feedback or “360‐degree” methods are studied from both a psychological and an organizational perspective. Psychological research indicates that multi‐ratings cannot be put on the same footing as ratings obtained from more “objective” sources as for instance the assessment center. Multi‐rater feedback can be interpreted either as standing in the tradition of assessment centers, or originating from “total quality management”, but it seems more congenial to the TQM method of organizing “customer feedback”. Since multi‐rater feedback presupposes social interaction and consequently a work organization, the communicative conditions for such a feedback system are subsequently investigated from the perspective of organization science. It is investigated how various structural and cultural changes offer a fertile soil for the introduction of such kinds of feedback. However, the authors warn of the terror of “total feedback”.

Keywords

Citation

Jansen, P. and Vloeberghs, D. (1999), "Multi‐rater feedback methods: personal and organizational implications", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949910287903

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles