A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales

Robert Loo (Faculty of Management, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Publication date: 1 February 2002

Abstract

Single‐item measures are quick and easy to use; however, methodologists advocate the use of multiple‐item measures. Recently, this stringent viewpoint has been challenged. Using the classical formula for the correction for attenuation and job satisfaction data, they demonstrated that meaningful reliability estimates can be calculated for single‐item measures. This study examined this approach using “belief in a just world” data from two instruments. The findings provide qualified support for single‐item measures when the underlying constructs are homogeneous, but these findings are not strong enough to challenge the view that multiple‐item measures are needed to measure relatively complex constructs reliably. Practitioners and researchers should be wary of single‐item measures.

Keywords

Citation

Robert Loo (2002) "A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 68-75

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210415933

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.