To read this content please select one of the options below:

Managing conflict in collaborative new product development: a supplier perspective

Ping Kit Lam (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong)
Kwai Sang Chin (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong)
Kit Fai Pun (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 16 October 2007

2770

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the distribution of conflict over various NPD phases and identify the main sources of conflict and the five conflict handling styles in new product development (NPD) from the context of buyer‐supplier collaboration.

Design/methodology/approach

A list of the sources of conflict was developed and five conflict handling styles in NPD were identified based on literature review and the opinions of manufacturing experts in Hong Kong. An empirical study comprising a series of personal interviews and a mailed survey was conducted to acquire empirical findings from industry practitioners and suppliers on the conflict issues in collaborative NPD. The relationships between NPD performance and conflict intensity as well as conflict handling styles were analysed. Both reliability and construct validity of the study construct were measured.

Findings

The study identified 16 sources of conflict and demonstrated that conflict has a significant negative relationship with NPD performance in terms of product quality, and meeting of target development costs and delivery schedule. The results also showed that cooperative styles (i.e. integrating and obliging) are effective and uncooperative styles (i.e. dominating and avoiding) are ineffective, whereas compromising is a neutral approach.

Research limitations/implications

This research was based on four industry sectors including electronics, toys, machinery, and watches and clocks in Hong Kong. Generalisability to other industries or countries may be limited.

Practical implications

The findings verified that a negative relationship exists between conflict intensity and NPD performance. Both the clients and suppliers should maintain a sustainable level of conflict and should enhance their conflict handling efforts and skills for effective conflict resolutions.

Originality/value

From a suppliers' viewpoint, this paper provides some insights into how client‐supplier collaboration and conflict resolutions could improve NPD performance.

Keywords

Citation

Kit Lam, P., Sang Chin, K. and Fai Pun, K. (2007), "Managing conflict in collaborative new product development: a supplier perspective", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 891-907. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710826171

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles