To read this content please select one of the options below:

A new loss function‐based method for evaluating manufacturing and environmental risks

Jeh‐Nan Pan (Department of Statistics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 11 September 2007

1124

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research is to provide a new loss function‐based risk assessment method so the likelihood and consequence resulting from the failure of a manufacturing or environmental system can be evaluated simultaneously.

Design/methodology/approach

Instead of using risk matrices of the occurrence and consequence separately for evaluating manufacturing and environmental risks, an integrated approach by exploring the relationship between process capability indices: Cp, Cpk and Cpm, and three different loss functions: Taguchi's loss function; Inverted normal loss function (INLF); and Revised inverted normal loss function (RINLF) is proposed.

Findings

The new method of quantitative risk assessment linking the likelihood and expected loss of failure is illustrated by two numeric examples. The results suggest that the revised inverted normal loss function (RINLF) be used in assessing manufacturing and environmental risks.

Practical implications

It gives decision‐makers a concrete tool to assess the likelihood and consequence of their processes. Linking the process capability indices and loss functions is particularly promising, as this provides a useful risk assessment tool for practitioners who want to reduce hazardous waste and manufacturing losses from their facilities.

Originality/value

The manufacturing and environmental risks are determined by paring the process capability indices and loss function. From the loss function‐based estimation, one can quantify the consequence of a manufacturing loss and get the severity rating in an objective way.

Keywords

Citation

Pan, J. (2007), "A new loss function‐based method for evaluating manufacturing and environmental risks", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 861-887. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710817135

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles