To read this content please select one of the options below:

Achieving quality construction projects based on harmonious working relationships ‐ Clients’ and architects’ perceptions of contractor performance

Robby Soetanto (Built Environment Research Unit, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK)
David G. Proverbs (Built Environment Research Unit, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK)
Gary D. Holt (Built Environment Research Unit, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 1 July 2001

2646

Abstract

The results of an investigative study aimed at assessing the performance of construction contractors, as perceived by clients and architects in the UK, are presented. The assessment uses predetermined generic performance criteria and involves two measurements, namely perceived importance (I) and perceived performance (P). Importance‐performance analyses are then carried out using three measures, namely average satisfaction (D), percentage response (R) and priority rank (PR). Results indicate a need for contractors to improve in most aspects of performance. Generally, architects are found to be less satisfied than clients in regard to overall contractor performance. Furthermore, the perceptions of clients and architects regarding D and PR are broadly similar. It is implied that a well‐planned and designed performance improvement strategy on behalf of contractors will address the needs of both clients and architects. Findings will be of interest to contractors embarking on projects with clients and architects.

Keywords

Citation

Soetanto, R., Proverbs, D.G. and Holt, G.D. (2001), "Achieving quality construction projects based on harmonious working relationships ‐ Clients’ and architects’ perceptions of contractor performance", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 528-548. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710110392836

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles