Predictor‐corrector procedures for pseudo‐dynamic tests

Abstract

Purpose

To propose novel predictor‐corrector time‐integration algorithms for pseudo‐dynamic testing.

Design/methodology/approach

The novel predictor‐corrector time‐integration algorithms are based on both the implicit and the explicit version of the generalized‐α method. In the non‐linear unforced case second‐order accuracy, stability in energy, energy decay in the high‐frequency range as well as asymptotic annihilation are distinctive properties of the generalized‐α scheme; while in the non‐linear forced case they are the limited error near the resonance in terms of frequency location and intensity of the resonant peak. The implicit generalized‐α algorithm has been implemented in a predictor‐one corrector form giving rise to the implicit IPC‐ρ_∞ method, able to avoid iterative corrections which are expensive from an experimental standpoint and load oscillations of numerical origin. Moreover, the scheme embodies a secant stiffness formula able to approximate closely the actual stiffness of a structure. Also an explicit algorithm has been implemented, the EPC‐ρ_b method, endowed with user‐controlled dissipation properties. The resulting schemes have been tested experimentally both on a two‐ and on a six‐degrees‐of‐freedom system, exploiting substructuring techniques.

Findings

The analytical findings and the tests have indicated that the proposed numerical strategies enhance the performance of the pseudo‐dynamic test (PDT) method even in an environment characterized by considerable experimental errors. Moreover, the schemes have been tested numerically on strongly non‐linear multiple‐degrees‐of‐freedom systems reproduced with the Bouc‐Wen hysteretic model, showing that the proposed algorithms reap the benefits of the parent generalized‐α methods.

Research limitations/implications

Further developments envisaged for this study are the application of the IPC‐ρ_∞ method and of EPC‐ρ_b scheme to partitioned procedures for high‐speed pseudo‐dynamic testing with substructuring.

Practical implications

The implicit IPC‐ρ_∞ and the explicit EPC‐ρ_b methods allow a user to have defined dissipation which reduces the effects of experimental error in the PDT without needing onerous iterations.

Originality/value

The paper proposes novel time‐integration algorithms for pseudo‐dynamic testing. Thanks to a predictor‐corrector form of the generalized‐α method, the proposed schemes maintain a high computational efficiency and accuracy.

Citation

Bonelli, A. and Bursi, O.S. (2005), "Predictor‐corrector procedures for pseudo‐dynamic tests", Engineering Computations, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 783-834. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400510619530