To read this content please select one of the options below:

Should the valuer be the insurer of all of the client’s risks?

Rosalind Lee (Rosalind Lee is Senior Lecturer at the Department of Land and Construction Management at the University of Portsmouth, UK)

Property Management

ISSN: 0263-7472

Article publication date: 1 June 1996

756

Abstract

Discusses the issue of damages in the Court of Appeal decision in Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v. Eagle Star Insurance [1995]. Suggests that policy issues, whether or not made explicit, must inevitably be considered in reaching a conclusion as to which party ought to be liable for damages for economic loss due to a fall in the property market. To do otherwise is to risk making the valuer the insurer of all of the client’s risks.

Keywords

Citation

Lee, R. (1996), "Should the valuer be the insurer of all of the client’s risks?", Property Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637479610115512

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Related articles