To read this content please select one of the options below:

Governance in a co‐ownership environment: The management of multiple‐ownership property in Hong Kong

E.M. Hastings (Department of Real Estate and Construction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China)
S.K. Wong (Department of Real Estate and Construction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China)
Megan Walters (Bovis Lend Lease, Harrow, UK)

Property Management

ISSN: 0263-7472

Article publication date: 1 May 2006

2390

Abstract

Purpose

To examine how the allocation of property rights in multiple‐ownership buildings in Hong Kong creates an environment in which the optimization of asset value may be difficult to achieve and in this situation how owners chose to overcome the associated problems of collective action decision making to resolve issues of building management.

Design/methodology/approach

An institutional approach, drawn from the literature on common property and collective action, is used to examine the management of multiple‐ownership property. The paper uses a hedonic pricing model to empirically test whether, in such circumstances, management is reflected in property price and which mode of governance owners prefer as a mechanism for resolving problems of collective action.

Findings

The institutional arrangements for co‐ownership and use of multiple‐ownership property assets in Hong Kong have resulted in an “anticommons” environment, in which individual owners are in a position to veto action in relation to the property. In the absence of mandatory management the study indicates property prices are increased in those cases where owners have chosen to resolve the difficulties of collective decision making by forming incorporate owners' groups and employing professional management services.

Research limitations/implications

The outcome of the empirical work is the result of an initial study carried out in one district in Hong Kong and may not be generalised. In the future, the approach will be extended to other areas.

Practical implications

In the absence of a regulatory environment which ensures the management of multiple‐ownership property assets, owners may be better advised to formalise arrangements through the formation of incorporate owners' groups and appointment of professional property management agents.

Originality/value

The paper assesses the implications of an anticommons environment for the management of multiple‐ownership property in Hong Kong. Examines arrangements for collective decision making and demonstrates influence of management on property price.

Keywords

Citation

Hastings, E.M., Wong, S.K. and Walters, M. (2006), "Governance in a co‐ownership environment: The management of multiple‐ownership property in Hong Kong", Property Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470610660165

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles