To read this content please select one of the options below:

Occupational futures? Divesting real estate and corporate PFI

Gaye Pottinger (College of Estate Management, Whiteknights, Reading, UK)
Tim Dixon (College of Estate Management, Whiteknights, Reading, UK)
Andrew Marston (College of Estate Management, Whiteknights, Reading, UK)

Property Management

ISSN: 0263-7472

Article publication date: 1 March 2002

1762

Abstract

Property ownership can tie up large amounts of capital and management energy that business could employ more productively elsewhere. Competitive pressures, accounting changes and increasingly sophisticated occupier requirements are building demand for new and innovative ways to satisfy corporate occupation needs. The investment climate is also changing. Falling interest rates and falling inflation can be expected to undermine returns from the traditional FRI lease. In future, investment returns will be more dependent on active and innovative management geared to the needs of occupiers on whom income depends. Occupier and investor interests, therefore, look set to coincide, but unlocking the potential for both parties will depend on developing new finance and investment vehicles that align their respective needs. In the UK, examples include PFI in the public sector and off‐balance sheet financing in the private sector. In the USA, “synthetic lease” structures have also become popular. Growing investment market experience in assessing risks and returns suggests scope for further innovative arrangements in the corporate sector. But how can such arrangements be structured? What are the risks, drivers and barriers?

Keywords

Citation

Pottinger, G., Dixon, T. and Marston, A. (2002), "Occupational futures? Divesting real estate and corporate PFI", Property Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470210418951

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles