To read this content please select one of the options below:

The best and worst time for management development

Mike Broussine (Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Mike Gray (Bath City Council, Bath, UK)
Phil Kirk (Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Kimberly Paumier (Bath City Council, Bath, UK)
Mike Tichelar (Bath City Council, Bath, UK)
Stephen Young (Bath City Council, Bath, UK)

Journal of Management Development

ISSN: 0262-1711

Article publication date: 1 February 1998

1660

Abstract

Can the worst time for an organisation provide the best circumstances for management learning? One UK local authority began a management development programme 18 months before a wholescale reorganisation. This was not regarded as a rational thing to do. Explores the messiness and the politics that had to be worked with by those believing that a programme was necessary. However, training anxious and cynical managers about rational strategic models of change would be wholly inappropriate. Instead, the programme addressed the often hidden struggles, messiness, anxiety, incertainty and politics which influence management learning in a complex and turbulent organisation. The article outline participants’ feelings about the learning processes, and explains how connections were made between personal learning and organisational change. Finally it assesses the programme’s outcomes, concluding that this “bad time” for the organisation resulted in the development of managers’ ability to handle a terrifying amount of change.

Keywords

Citation

Broussine, M., Gray, M., Kirk, P., Paumier, K., Tichelar, M. and Young, S. (1998), "The best and worst time for management development", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719810368691

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles