To read this content please select one of the options below:

Relationships between various measurements of workplace performance

Lawson K. Savery (Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia)
Geoffrey N. Soutar (Edith Cowan University and Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia)

Journal of Management Development

ISSN: 0262-1711

Article publication date: 1 February 1997

1524

Abstract

Considers the relationship between various measurements of workplace performance. Examines data collected from 2,004 workplaces in the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey. Identifies three groups, the first of which, just over half of the sample, was named the “successful internal group” because it had the lowest rate of return and the lowest industrial activity. The second group, approximately one‐third of the sample, had the highest rate of return and a similar level of industrial activity to that of the first group and was called the “successful both internal and external” group. The third group, approximately one‐sixth of the sample, had the highest level of industrial action, the second highest rate of return but the worst relationships between management and employees, and was designated the “successful external group”. The “successful internal” and the “successful internal and external” groups tended to occupy smaller, white‐collar workplaces and to employ a greater percentage of women.

Keywords

Citation

Savery, L.K. and Soutar, G.N. (1997), "Relationships between various measurements of workplace performance", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719710155463

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Related articles