To read this content please select one of the options below:

The unfulfilled promise of management education (ME): the role, value and purposes of ME

Howard Thomas (Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore)
Lynne Thomas (Visual Counselling and Coaching, UK)
Alex Wilson (School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK and Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore)

Journal of Management Development

ISSN: 0262-1711

Article publication date: 17 May 2013

1606

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to review the evolution of management education primarily over the last 50 years and seeks to identify the challenges and lessons learned in management education and to assess the potential for change. To gain insight into these issues the authors draw on the perspectives of around 40 key individuals from academia, professional bodies, media, business and students.

Design/methodology/approach

The content of the paper is based upon a qualitative analysis of around 40 two‐to‐three hour interviews of key global players in the management education field.

Findings

The key stakeholders in management education are identified as students, business and employers respectively. But in terms of relative stakeholder influence faculty, business and students are the top three influencers. Faculty represent the supply‐side whereas business and students represent the demand side of management education. There is evidence that higher tuition fees may increase the power of students and business relative to faculty. The individuals who have had the greatest influence on management education are academics such as Mintzberg and Drucker rather than business school deans or administrators. Institutions such as INSEAD, IMD and Harvard have had the greatest influence. The main issues and challenges identified in Management Education include information technology, globalisation, the role of faculty, competition and business model performance. Few game changing innovations in curricula have occurred in management education raising the question of how change will occur in the future.

Originality/value

There are few in‐depth, open‐ended interview studies of key participants in the field of management education. It adds insights to a range of more reflective literature studies from writers such as Khurana, Mintzberg and Pfeffer.

Keywords

Citation

Thomas, H., Thomas, L. and Wilson, A. (2013), "The unfulfilled promise of management education (ME): the role, value and purposes of ME", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 460-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711311328255

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles