TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose– Theorizing that was conceived in the 1970s about gendered processes in organizations helped explain gender inequalities in organizations. This article aims to take the opportunity to re‐examine these processes – including the gendered substructure of organizations, gendered subtext, the gendered logic of organization and the abstract worker from the perspective of the original author in a present‐day context.Design/methodology/approach– A reflexive approach was used to consider how gender theorizing itself has become more complex as captured in the notion of intersectionality when gender process interacts with other forms of inequality.Findings– The key finding is the persistence of inequality regimes despite organizational changes, which still make developments in theorizing gender processes relevant.Originality/value– This article is an opportunity to reflect on the conceptualization and development of one's theorizing over three decades, which has suggested that there are still key questions that demand answers from academics and practitioners who want to challenge these inequality regimes.
VL  - 31
IS  - 3
SN  - 2040-7149
DO  - 10.1108/02610151211209072
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151211209072
AU  - Acker Joan
ED  - Susan Sayce
PY  - 2012
Y1  - 2012/01/01
TI  - Gendered organizations and intersectionality: problems and possibilities
T2  - Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 214
EP  - 224
Y2  - 2024/09/19
ER  -