To read this content please select one of the options below:

Profit‐making vs human value: philosophy's contribution

Cristina Neesham (Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia)
Charmine E.J. Härtel (Monash University, Clayton, Australia)
Ken Coghill (Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia)
James Sarros (Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia)

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

ISSN: 2040-7149

Article publication date: 16 September 2010

1912

Abstract

Purpose

This paper responds to the increasing concern among both the public and the academic community regarding the negative effects of for‐profit activities of organisations on society, in particular on human development and well‐being. It does so by aiming to examine the main theories regarding the possibility of positive and/or negative relationships between the management of for‐profit activity and human value. It aims to identify guiding principles to assist organisations in meeting the business imperative of respecting and considering their effects on human rights wherever they operate.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper takes a conceptual approach drawing from economic, social and political philosophy literature to investigate four perspectives on the relationship between the management of for‐profit activity and human value.

Findings

The need for management theory to develop a typology of factors determining positive, negative or mixed effects of for‐profit activity on human value is identified. The study identifies recommendations for management theory and practice regarding the scope and limits of action that could be taken by business organisations to improve human value.

Research limitations/implications

Research questions relevant to three key areas of management (people management, operational management and strategic management) are suggested.

Practical implications

The paper concludes that there is a need to understand why there are negative relationships between profit making and human value, and how to identify the means of minimising this relationship in a human value oriented organisation.

Social implications

The paper responds to the increasing concern among both the public and the academic community regarding the negative effects of for‐profit activities of organisations on society, in particular on human development and well‐being. It does so by proposing the guiding philosophical principles that should inform organisations in meeting the business imperative of respecting and considering their effects on human rights wherever they operate.

Originality/value

The paper is unique in proposing the guiding philosophical principles that should inform a human value oriented workplace culture and can be applied in various management sub‐disciplines. It also makes an original attempt to understand the gap between conflictualist and compatibilist paradigms and how this can inform management theory.

Keywords

Citation

Neesham, C., Härtel, C.E.J., Coghill, K. and Sarros, J. (2010), "Profit‐making vs human value: philosophy's contribution", Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 593-608. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151011067522

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles