To read this content please select one of the options below:

Organisational Justice and Perceived Fairness of Hiring Decisions Related to Race and Gender: Affirmative Action Reactions

Amy McMillan‐Capehart (East Carolina University, College of Business, 3124 Bate Building, Greenville, NC 27858)
Orlando Richard (University of Texas at Dallas, School of Man agement, Box 830688, Richardson,TX 75083‐0688)

Equal Opportunities International

ISSN: 0261-0159

Article publication date: 1 January 2005

1611

Abstract

A laboratory experiment explores the perceived fairness of hiring decisions with regards to justifications that might reduce the negative reactions of job recipients. In particular, we examine the effects of no justification, and the affirmative action argument on the perceived fairness of the hiring of women and minorities. Results indicate that the hiring decision is perceived to be fairer when no justification is given than when affirmative action is used to justify the decision. The perception of decision was further moderated by proportional values with stronger effects for men than women.

Keywords

Citation

McMillan‐Capehart, A. and Richard, O. (2005), "Organisational Justice and Perceived Fairness of Hiring Decisions Related to Race and Gender: Affirmative Action Reactions", Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150510787953

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles