TY  - JOUR
AB  - Offers a response to David Laidler’s article “More on Hawtrey, Harvard and Chicago”, in this issue. Asserts that the unique Chicagoan quantity‐theory of the early 1930s embodied a policy framework which left it immune from the Keynesian revolution and contained important linkages with Friedman’s views in its business‐cycle analysis and policy positions. Claims that this tradition explains why Chicago (and not Harvard) originated the monetarist counter‐revolution.
VL  - 25
IS  - 1
SN  - 0144-3585
DO  - 10.1108/01443589810368163
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/01443589810368163
AU  - Tavlas George S.
PY  - 1998
Y1  - 1998/01/01
TI  - More on the Chicago tradition
T2  - Journal of Economic Studies
PB  - MCB UP Ltd
SP  - 17
EP  - 21
Y2  - 2024/04/26
ER  -