Performance measurement in tax offices with a stochastic frontier model

Carlos Pestana Barros (Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal)

Journal of Economic Studies

ISSN: 0144-3585

Publication date: 1 December 2005

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to call the attention of public entities for the econometric frontier models which allows benchmarking the tax offices accurately. In the context of the European Maastricht, the European countries face public receipts shortage and to focus in the management of the tax agencies in order to maximize receipts. The procedure adopted in this paper allows benchmarking the tax agencies accurately.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper adopts the stochastic frontier model to benchmark the tax offices. This model is presently very popular in benchmarking exercises, based on its statistical framework.

Findings

The paper finds that the tax offices analysed vary along the sample and along the period.

Research limitations/implications

The homogeneity of the tax offices and the short data set are the main limitations of the paper. Relative to the first, since they are managed by the same entity and perform the same task we can claim that they are similar, relative to the second critic, we cannot overcome it because of the secrecy related to this units.

Practical implication

The efficiency rankings are due to the way the tax offices handle costs and outputs. The way they handle the combination of output and inputs is explained in the literature by the principal‐agent relationship, by collective‐action problem, due to asymmetric information between different tax offices and X‐inefficiency. The public policy has to address these problems in order to upgrade the efficiency of the tax offices.

Originality/value

This is the first paper adopting the stochastic frontier model in tax offices.

Keywords

Citation

Pestana Barros, C. (2005), "Performance measurement in tax offices with a stochastic frontier model", Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580510631388

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.