To read this content please select one of the options below:

Policy and practice: The relationship between family policy regime and women's labour market participation in Europe

Thomas P. Boje (Department of Society and Globalisation, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark)
Anders Ejrnæs (Department of Society and Globalisation, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 31 August 2012

2112

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop a typology of different family policy systems in Europe and evaluate their impact on the employment strategy of mothers with care responsibilities for dependent children.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper outlines a typology of family policy regimes in Europe – covering the 26 countries. A typology based on a cluster analysis of macro indicators of family policy – coverage of childcare, effective parental leave and spending on family policies. The cluster analysis is based on data from OECD family data base. Then follows an analysis of the impact of the different family policy regimes on mothers' employment strategies when they return into gainful employment, based on data from the European Social Survey, 2008.

Findings

The authors have identified four different family policy models: extensive family policy, long parental leave, family care, and cash for care. For each of the models, different strategies are found for take up of employment for mothers with dependent children.

Originality/value

The paper includes 26 European countries, thereby covering the East and Central Europe, which is not the case in most welfare typologies. Furthermore, the authors distinguish clearly in the analyses between the institutional dimension and the outcome – mothers' employment strategies.

Keywords

Citation

Boje, T.P. and Ejrnæs, A. (2012), "Policy and practice: The relationship between family policy regime and women's labour market participation in Europe", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 32 No. 9/10, pp. 589-605. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331211257670

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles