TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to call for re‐thinking of the universal minimum‐age approach to problems of child labour.Design/methodology/approach– The authors point out that there has been no serious policy analysis on universal minimum‐age approaches, and question common assumptions concerning such policies by reviewing available knowledge on the impact of work on children.Findings– Available research does not support a presumption that blanket minimum‐age laws are beneficial. In some cases, it is clear that they are injurious to children, underlining the need for systematic policy analysis.Practical implications– The promotion of universalized minimum‐age policies should cease until their effect on children has been reliably assessed. In the meantime, more energy and investment should be devoted to alternative, proven ways of combating forms and conditions of work that are genuinely likely to cause harm, and to promoting access to education.Originality/value– This paper contributes towards introducing more appropriate policy on children's work.
VL  - 29
IS  - 3/4
SN  - 0144-333X
DO  - 10.1108/01443330910947480
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330910947480
AU  - Bourdillon Michael F.C.
AU  - White Ben
AU  - Myers William E.
ED  - Madeline Leonard
PY  - 2009
Y1  - 2009/01/01
TI  - Re‐assessing minimum‐age standards for children's work
T2  - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 106
EP  - 117
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -