Argues that Humphrey’s tearoom trade study, misinforms readers as much as it informs, regarding moral and ethical foundations for research with human subjects. States that Humphrey’s tearoom study made significant positive contributions to the population he studied. Concludes that few studies in sociology have accomplished as much in a single work.
Lenza, M. (2004), "Controversies surrounding Laud Humphreys’ tearoom trade: an unsettling example of politics and power in methodological critiques", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 24 No. 3/4/5, pp. 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330410790858
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited