Weld‐bonding: the best or worst of two processes?

Abstract

Weld‐bonding combines the physical force‐based process of welding with the chemical force‐based process of bonding or, more properly, adhesive bonding. When done properly, the claim is that a hybrid process results which offers the best of both processes; the high joint efficiency, resistance to diverse and complex loading, and temperature tolerance of welding; the load‐spreading, stress concentration‐softening, and structural damage tolerance of adhesive bonding. And, beyond these individual process attributes, there are claims, or at least predictions, of synergistic benefits in the form of improved energy absorption and fatigue life for demanding applications. However, it is difficult to find reliable data in the open literature to support these real or potential benefits. Furthermore, complications in performing the hybrid process in practice place an even greater premium on process control than normal. This paper explores the question, “Is it all worth it?” The paper delves into the theory underlying weld‐bonding, the facts concerning the process including pluses and pitfalls, and considers where the process could or should go from here.

Citation

Messler, R.W. (2002), "Weld‐bonding: the best or worst of two processes?", Industrial Robot, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439910210419150