“All together better?” Single status and union recognition in the chemical industry

Alan Tuckman (Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Publication date: 1 April 1998


In the debate leading up to the publication of the proposed Government White Paper Fairness at Work, companies which have de‐recognised unions have been portrayed by the unions as looking backwards to “Victorian” employment practices. This paper traces the development of “single status” ‐ effecively the de‐recognition of trade unions ‐ at BP Chemicals. It indicates that, after an initial phase of “macho” tactics at its Baglan Bay site, management adopted an apparently more consensual approach at its two other main sites utilising ballots of workers for the “single status” package. Further, the package introduced Employee Forums on each site which formed the basis of the establishment of a European Works Council. As such it leads to a questioning of the effectiveness of measures in the White Paper to bring about a return to trade union recognition.



Tuckman, A. (1998), "“All together better?” Single status and union recognition in the chemical industry", Employee Relations, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459810211304

Download as .RIS




Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.